Author Archives: Uyen-Phuong Nguyen

About Uyen-Phuong Nguyen

Born in Vietnam. Currently training in Japan as an internship student from Wageningen University & Research (Netherlands). Specializing in biochemistry and researches for food safety standards in various countries.

Canadian mandatory front-of-pack labeling : important highlights

Canada issued the new Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (Nutrition Symbols, Other Labelling Provisions, Vitamin D and Hydrogenated Fats or Oils) in July 2022. This amendment covers a new requirement for mandated front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling on pre-packaged foods that are high in nutrients of public health concerns . This initiative aims to provide information and guidance to consumers, enabling them to make healthier food choices and reduce health risks associated with excessive consumption of these nutrients. Based on stakeholders comments and questions, Health Canada published “Front-of-package nutrition symbol labelling guide for industry” in May 2023. This newsletter will briefly highlight the important points in this new change and what foreign manufacturers and the food industry need to know.

What’s new?

All foods that contain a determined threshold or more of saturated fat, sodium and/or sugars will have to adhere to the new FOP nutrition labeling.

When is the symbol required?

The FOP nutrition symbol is based on predefined thresholds for various nutrients, which are determined using the Daily Value (%DV) reference. If a food product meets or exceeds the specified threshold for saturated fat, sodium, or sugars, as outlined in the regulations, it will have to display the “high in” FOP nutrition symbol.

Such a symbol must appear on the FOP for:

Types of food Reference amount Thresholds for saturated fat, sodium and sugars
Prepackaged foods with a reference amount ≤30ml or 30g ≥10% DV
Prepackaged foods with a reference amount that are not main dishes >30ml or 30g ≥15%DV
Pre-packaged foods (main dishes) ≥200g (adults) or ≥170g (children one to four years) ≥30%DV

Steps for determining whether a product meets or exceeds the FOP nutrition symbol thresholds

Annex I of the regulation provides a comprehensive outline of the steps involved in determining whether the nutrient content meets or exceeds the threshold and triggers the FOP nutrition symbol. The regulation includes specific guidelines for different scenarios, taking into account factors such as serving size, reference amount, presence of trans-fat, and the target consumers. The general steps are as follows:

  1. Identify the target consumers: Determine the intended consumers of the product, considering specific rules for foods intended for children of certain ages.
  2. Identify the quantity of food. The quantity of food is based either on the serving size or reference amount, depending on whichever quantity is greater. Consult the separate table, Tale of Reference Amounts, to determine what is the appropriate quantity.
  3. Identify the corresponding %DV: Calculate the %DV (Daily Value) for each nutrient based on the chosen quantity of food.
  4. Compare the %DV with the base quantity of the product. If one or more nutrients meet or exceed the %DV, a symbol for the nutrient or nutrients is required.

Presentation of Labeling

The regulation provides flexibility in terms of label presentation formats, but it mandates the inclusion of certain elements regardless of the chosen format. In a white and black color scheme, the FOP nutritional symbol incorporates a magnifying glass icon situated on the left. The “High in” sign effectively communicates the presence of fat, sugars, sodium, or any relevant combination. The symbol “Health Canada / Santé Canada” is displayed at the bottom. The following figures are examples of Health Canada’s FOP nutrition symbol formats (in English-only or bilingual version)

The food industry has been given a deadline (until January 1, 2026), to incorporate this change into their operations. The implementation of this new regulation holds significant importance for manufacturers and food business operators looking to enter the Canadian market. As the regulation takes effect, it is expected to have an impact on various industries. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to become familiar with the new changes in order to adapt and comply accordingly.

Regarding the Japanese labeling rules, while total fat is required, it is not mandatory to declare saturated fat or trans-fat. Sodium is represented in the form of salt equivalent. Therefore, it is necessary to convert sodium into salt equivalent. While Canada requires to separately declare sugars from total carbohydrates, it is not mandatory in Japan.

Currently there is no standard or obligation to label “high in” sugars, saturated fat or sodium in Japan, while Canada covers certain various claims such as “lean”, “lightly salted”, “unsweetened”, “no sugar-added”, “no added fat”, or “%fat free”. “Unsweetened” claim is different from “no sugar”, or “no sugar added claim”. On the other hand, Japan only has 3 types of claims related to such nutrients: “free” (zero, non-), “low”(or light), and “reduced”. Claims such as “lean”, “unsweetened”, %fat free”, and so on are not listed in the reference. Therefore, some claims could be permissible in Canada but might not be applicable in Japan. It is important to verify and understand well the standards of the claims.

References:


Newsletter Signup

We issue monthly e-newsletters, which provide you with the latest updates on food labeling/regulations in Japan.
If you want to make sure to not miss any issue, please click below.

Related Service

Research Services on Ingredients & Food Labeling -For the Japanese Market-
We verify the conformity of ingredients and additives with the standards for use in Japan based on specifications such as formulation lists. We also verify the conformity of the proposed labeling of ingredient names, nutrients, etc. with the labeling standards based on specifications such as formulation lists.

Recent Food Labeling Trends on Sustainability

Recently, sustainability has been the motive behind some new movements and legislations. Sustainability in the food industry includes various different aspects, and in this newsletter, we will explore two prevalent food labeling regulations trends that focus on food waste and plastic circular practices of foreign countries, particularly the EU and Korea. We would like to help our readers to stay informed about the latest regulations and any incoming updates.

The two countries that have already implemented mandatory eco-labelling in the EU are France and Italy. The EU has revised the new proposal to put an end to wasteful packaging, including a ban on unnecessary packaging and overpackaging while promoting reusable materials. Here are some highlights:

  • Notably, Article 5 and 6 of the Proposal are dedicated exclusively to the sustainability and recycling aspects.
  • Article 6 states that all packaging materials shall be recyclable.
  • Article 46, at least 65% by weight of packaging waste should be recycled by 2025.
  • Article 8, 4 packaging formats (tea and coffee bags, tea and coffee single-serve systems, fruit and vegetable sticky labels and very lightweight plastic carrier bags) must be compostable so that this packaging can go together with the product into the bio-waste stream.
  • Article 9 highlights the minimisation of plastic packaging, which is not necessary for any function or performance listed in Annex IV of the same proposal, empty spaces, and certain restrictions on packaging formats → This is pretty relevant to a lot of products imported from Japan as Japanese products are commonly found to have multi-packing within one outer package. Therefore, it is beneficial to keep in mind these requirements.
  • Article 11, the recycle content, composition and mandatory sorting instructions for consumers must be labeled on the package.
  • Article 12, all waste receptacles for collection of packaging waste would also have to be labeled by 1 January 2028, to enable the separate collection of each material-specific parts of packaging waste.
  • After the entry into force of this regulation, all packaging will be subject to show the composition of the packaging materials and must display a label indicating its reusability, as well as a digital QR code or data carrier providing additional information on reusability.

Similarly, South Korea has also been quite active in this movement as well. South Korea passed the Act of Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources, in which PVC is banned and PET packaging should be colorless, detachable and labels easy to remove. The labels should show information on the type of packaging and materials so that it can be easy to understand for consumers.

In addition to plastic packaging waste, a similar movement to tackle food waste is underway in South Korea. The new legislation came into force, replacing ”best before” date with a ”use-by” date on a front of pack labeling. (Food Labeling Act, 2021; Imported Food Act, 2023). This regulation aims to reduce food waste caused by premature loss of foods while it is still safe to eat. Therefore, food manufacturers must consider their shelf-life mainly for safety purposes.

Reflecting the Japanese regulation, the Japanese recycling system categorizes mandatory identification marks into 5 groups: Plastic, Paper, PET bottles, steel cans and aluminum cans. It is worth noting that the Plastic containers and packaging category is separated from the PET category, and the PET mark is only applied to PET bottles. Similarly, the steel and aluminum marks are only applied to can containers. In Japan, the obligation to identify recyclable marks is separate from the obligation to recycle. While manufacturers are required to label steel and aluminum cans for recycling, they are not obligated to recycle. On the other hand, it is not mandatory to identify “Glass” for recycling; however manufactures have the obligation to recycle glass.

The figures below illustrate the different types of recycle marks. Here are the recycling marks differences in the three regions: Japan (top), Korea (middle), and EU (bottom) (in corresponding orders).

References

[EU]

[Korea]

[Japan]


Newsletter Signup

We issue monthly e-newsletters, which provide you with the latest updates on food labeling/regulations in Japan.
If you want to make sure to not miss any issue, please click below.

Related Service

Research Services on Ingredients & Food Labeling -For the Japanese Market-
We verify the conformity of ingredients and additives with the standards for use in Japan based on specifications such as formulation lists. We also verify the conformity of the proposed labeling of ingredient names, nutrients, etc. with the labeling standards based on specifications such as formulation lists.