Monthly Archives: November 2022

Differences in food labeling and its concept between the United Kingdom and Japan

Since the UK-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) entered into force on January 1, 2021, the free trade agreement between the UK and Japan has continued to evolve, bringing tremendous benefits to both countries in their main markets including food and beverage. Regarding the current state of the UK market, in 2020, about half (46%) of the food consumed in the UK was imported. After Brexit, the UK is expected to continue to increase its exports as well as imports of non-EU and EU products following a series of trade agreements with EU countries, New Zealand, Australia, and Japan.

In this issue, we asked our UK partner, Ashbury, the company dealing with food information, about the UK regulatory situation. This article covers points of particular note among the different labeling rules that arise when comparing the labeling systems between Japan and the UK.

Understanding the roles and responsibilities of the relevant regulatory agencies

When exporting foods, it is important to understand the related export system. The website of the Food Standards Agency in the UK, which supervises food labeling, provides information on standards and other practical information. Prepackaged food products distributed in the UK are subject to the Provision of Food Information Regulation (EU No. 1169/2011), and local authorities are responsible for ensuring and monitoring compliance with food labels in line with their food information regulations. Certain foods such as bread, flour, chocolate, and jam are controlled by product specific regulations in the UK. As for food additives, the EU Regulation on Food Additives No 1333/2008 defines applicable food categories and (EU) No 231/2012 defines specifications for food additives. The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) is the regulatory agency for most advertising in the UK media and is responsible for monitoring advertising and dealing with problems.

Labeling of allergens and nutrition

Allergen and nutrition labeling methods vary widely from country to country, and differences in format, layout and typesetting are among the most common reasons why food labeling does not meet standards. It should be noted that labeling for allergens and nutrition facts in the UK is more broadly inclusive than those in Japan, such as for “nuts”. According to the UK Food Standards Agency alert, the most common recalls are caused by incorrect allergen labeling or undeclared contamination.
The UK specifies 14 allergens including peanuts, milk, eggs, and a wide range of crustaceans, nuts, molluscs, etc. All 14 different allergens or products containing them must be labeled unless the allergen or its product is clearly indicated by the legal name of the food. In addition, they must be emphasized in a way that distinguishes them from other ingredients, such as in bold. In particular, in the UK labeling, it is an industry standard to attach allergen advice statements, such as
-Allergen Advice: for allergens, see ingredients in bold.
Nutrition labeling must follow the prescribed format specified in Annex XV of (EU) 1169/2011. The format has a prescribed order: energy values (kJ and kcal), fat, saturates, carbohydrates, sugars, proteins, and salts (all in grams). Other than Japanese basic labeling items, saturates and sugars are also subject to mandatory labeling.

Difference in concept

There are similar labeling items in Japan about how to store, how to cook, or best before date, etc. but there are some differences in the concepts.

Used by/Best before date labeling

In the U.K., “best before” date shows the period of time related to the preservation of food quality, while “use by” date represents the period of time in which it is safe to eat and drink for foods that are susceptible to spoilage and may pose a risk to human health within a short period of time. As for “best before date”, it is generally indicated on the label, but some types of food products are exempt from showing the date. On the other hand, products manufactured in the UK often have specific date labeling such as “Use within 3 days after opening. This is because for safety reasons, if a different storage method is required for a product after opening, the storage method to be followed and the open life information must be indicated. For frozen meat, frozen meat preparations and frozen unprocessed fishery products, the date of freezing or the date of first freezing in cases where the product has been frozen more than once after the word “Frozen on”.

Country of origin

The country of origin labeling requirement does not specify special rules except for certain foods, such as meat and fish, or the case where special rules must be applied. The indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of a food shall be mandatory where failure to indicate this might mislead the consumer as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of the food. If the primary ingredient in the food comes from somewhere different from where the product says it was made, the label must show the country of origin of such primary ingredient.

Appropriate translation and standards-based labeling

Food labeling plays the role of “protecting consumer safety.” Literal translation may result in words and phrases that are not acceptable under local standards, and such misleading information may cause consumers to have safety concerns. For example, the word “natural” is often banned in the UK and has a clear definition. On the other hand, in Japan, it cannot be used in additives including flavours, whereas in the UK it can be used for the labeling of terms such as “natural flavours” if the specific requirements listed in (EC) No 1334/2008 are met.

It is important to compare the system of exporting partner countries and that of Japan, grasp the difference, understand the background of exporting countries and have labeling complied with their regulations. This article only covers a part of the differences in food labeling standards between the UK and Japan, but there are other differences as well. We hope that understanding the differences between the systems will give us a chance to understand each other’s culture and become one of the fruitful aspects of our work.

References


Newsletter Signup

We issue monthly e-newsletters, which provide you with the latest updates on food labeling/regulations in Japan.
If you want to make sure to not miss any issue, please click below.

Related Service

Research Services on Ingredients & Food Labeling -For the Japanese Market-
We verify the conformity of ingredients and additives with the standards for use in Japan based on specifications such as formulation lists. We also verify the conformity of the proposed labeling of ingredient names, nutrients, etc. with the labeling standards based on specifications such as formulation lists.

Japanese Agricultural Standards (JAS) for “Processed Food Suitable for Vegetarians or Vegans” established (JAPAN)

On September 6, 2022, the Japanese Agricultural Standards (JAS) for processed foods suitable for vegetarians or vegans was established. It was added to the JAS list on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries on the same day, and we would like to summarize the outline and key points for labeling below.

Background of summary

Around May 2021, a study for JAS standardization (study body: Japan Vegetarian Society, an authorized nonprofit organization) began, followed by an invitation for opinions on the draft for JAS in June 2022, and led to the current enactment. “Technical standards for the certification” and “inspection methods” are shown in line with the establishment of the “standard” for processed foods suitable for vegetarians or vegans. The standard defines the requirements for four foods: “processed food suitable for vegetarians who eat eggs and dairy products (Lacto-Ovo Vegetarians)”, “processed food suitable for vegetarians who eat eggs (Ovo-Vegetarians)”, “processed food suitable for vegetarians who eat dairy products (Lacto-Vegetarians)” and “processed food suitable for vegan”.

Standard for each food type (Clause 4)

According to this standard, the definition of each food type can be summarized as follows.

  Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume eggs and dairy products (Lacto-Ovo Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume eggs (Ovo-Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume dairy products (Lacto-Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegan
4a)   – Animal-derived primary and secondary ingredients (Processing aids for secondary ingredients shall be limited to bone charcoal obtained from animals and crustaceans) shall not be used.
– However, regardless of primary and secondary ingredients, in the case where ingredients/additives at any stage are easy to determine from the name of the ingredients or additives that they are animal derived, such ingredients/additives shall not be used.
Ingredients of animal-derived that can be used* Animal eggs or their processed foods

×

×

Animal milk or their processed foods

×

×

Honey or bee products (beeswax, propolis, etc.)

×

Wool fat containing lanolin

×

4b)

No animal tests of the above foods must be conducted by manufacturers, etc.

* “〇” includes its ingredients or their derivatives.

About Ingredient receipt, storage and manufacturing (Clause 5)

The standards for production process management can be summarized as follows.

 

Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume eggs and dairy products (Lacto-Ovo Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume eggs (Ovo-Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegetarians who consume dairy products (Lacto-Vegetarians) Processed food suitable for vegan
Receipt and storage of primary ingredients At the time of receipt of procured primary ingredients, the grounds for satisfying 4a) of each food shall be obtained, and the primary ingredients shall be managed separately so as not to be mixed with ingredients/additives which do not satisfy 4a).
Manufacturing – Appropriate precautions must be taken to prevent the unintentional contamination of unsuitable ingredients/additives in each food product.
– No oil for frying ingredients unsuitable for each food or processed food made from such ingredients shall be used.
– In the case where the production line for processed foods using ingredients/additives suitable for each food is shared with the production for processed foods using ingredients/additives unsuitable for each food, cleaning must be fully carried out before the start of the production of processed foods using ingredients/additives suitable for each food. This shall also apply to any surface with which the relevant machinery, equipment, tools and ingredients come into contact.

About labeling (Clause 6)

According to the definitions in the Standard, the labeling standard can be summarized as follows.

Terms*

“Vegetarians who consume eggs and dairy products (Lacto-Ovo Vegetarians)”

“Vegetarians who consume eggs (Ovo-Vegetarians)”

“Vegetarians who consume dairy products (Lacto-Vegetarians)”

“Vegan”
“Vegetarian”
Labeling items – The labeling of the above terms must meet the applicable requirements of Clause 4 (Standard for processed foods suitable for vegetarian or vegan consumption) and Clause 5 (Standard for production process control of processed foods suitable for vegetarian or vegan consumption).
– Even in the case of possible unintentional contamination of unsuitable ingredients/additives in each food product, the above terms may be indicated if appropriate precautions have been taken. – The above terms may be used even when an allergen alert based on the possibility of unintentional contamination of ingredients/additives unsuitable for each food product is labeled.
Labeling methods In order to distinguish processed foods similar to those of animal-derived, the above terms must be indicated in the same field of view as the product name of the processed foods.
Manner of Indication, etc. – (N/A)
Prohibited labeling items – (N/A)

* Terms with similar meanings to these are included as well.

Keeping an eye on future international trends

In March 2021, International Organization for Standardization for foods suitable for vegetarians or vegans, ISO 23662:Definitions and technical criteria for foods and food ingredients suitable for vegetarians or vegans and for labelling and claims) was published and it serves as a reference for the establishment of the JAS Standard this time.  On the other hand, regarding terms such as “plant-based” and “plant-based food”. the result of the public comment states that “there is no definition in Japan* or internationally, and we will monitor and respond to future international trends”. When considering the labeling of terms related to foods suitable for vegetarians or vegans as well as related terms such as plant-based, it would be a good idea to start by checking the JAS standard for this issue.

*For reference information at this time, the “Q&A on Labeling of Plant-Based Foods, etc. (Consumer Affairs Agency)” states, “‘Plant-based food’ as used in this Q&A refers to products made from mainly plant-derived ingredients (not including livestock or marine products) that resemble livestock products such as meat and fish or marine products such as fish. Even if animal-derived additives are contained, if the main ingredient is plant-derived, it shall be included in ‘plant-based food'”.

References


Newsletter Signup

We issue monthly e-newsletters, which provide you with the latest updates on food labeling/regulations in Japan.
If you want to make sure to not miss any issue, please click below.

Related Service

Research Services on Ingredients & Food Labeling -For the Japanese Market-
We verify the conformity of ingredients and additives with the standards for use in Japan based on specifications such as formulation lists. We also verify the conformity of the proposed labeling of ingredient names, nutrients, etc. with the labeling standards based on specifications such as formulation lists.